Kreygasm

Hijacking this thread with my first comment since 1891

hiyacked hard

ehehe)

oh god yes he's back, singularity was my fav vid of 2014, this is epic.

10/10 - music
10/10 - frags
10/10 - editing
10/10 - config
11/10 - feels

propa

really nice

I liked the music, and the config, the editing got a bit annoying (is that a solar flare at the start? In 2016?), the frags were pretty average and repetitive. 6/10.

once I saw fearzzz attacking people on purgatory who were oblivious to the fact they were right on MH i got pretty disheartened. weak frags for sure, although there were some really nice once as well (ash vs khan @ t7 RA room)

Heh, a few good frags, lots boring ones though. Why are there dm6 frags in 2016? B/ Although its better than the last QL movie I saw (was posted recently) where 50% of the frags were LG pins on the MH on Furious Heights.

Can you post a fragmovie you consider a 10?

The Contenders 2

Ah yes love that one

what about dorftrottel? I mean a lot of the frags in that movie are standard spawn runs, but the editing is unparalleled (imho).

Dorftrottel is surely a 10 aswell :)

May or may not guilty of the pinnage =)

> weak frags for sure

O_____

it's important to see that the opponents know how to play or else no matter how nice a frag it's fucking meaningless.

agreed. skill level of opponents in this movie is 'way too low'...

p.s. privetik

I wouldn't go that far. It does add a bit of value but a crazy, funny, or lucky frag can still be entertaining even if it's against some random. I'd rather watch an awesome frag against a random than a boring, every day frag against a top player.

I totally agree on this, but I know a lot of people don't!

A lot of the frags maybe routine for high tier players- But it looks like people having a shitload of fun playing Quake- like the dreamy vibe and song too

KHAN/10

360 NOSCOPE!!!

Solid 9/10, just awesome!

wntt/10

Solid work as always.

wow

that ironworks moment with winz gives me goosebumps

HOLY MEATBALLS MACCHERONI

nice rail flair^^

double double

TFW your frag gets put in at 4:20 and your name is next to fearzzz in credits
Is this real life?

Is this just fantasy?

Caught in a landslide, no escape from esreality

Who gave 6, let him speak now.

xerosawyer as he explains in the comment above. and I agree with him except I think its a 7.

10 before i even clicked download

Post it to hltv, return the favor :D

Glorious

5:41

Sooooo goood.

Incredible. Almost perfect. Easy 10/10.

awesome! 10/10

fears sutch a shitnab cant even fkn strafe lol

amirite guise?

amirite??? guise????





j/k guise 10/10. Some minor things such as fov and slight loss of momentum in second half were pushing me towards 9/10 but fearzzz definitely made up for it. motherfucking boss.

I don't really like being overly negative about other people's work in public, so I'll try to be as respectful as I can while being honest.

+ There are some really good frags distributed well enough to always keep the smile on the viewer's face.
+ The audio isn't fucked up like in almost every fragmovie.
- Most of the recams don't help appreciate or understand the frags better.
- The slow-fast-slow-fast effect gets annoying after a few times.
- I found the music to be just forgettable.
- Not enough of the music gets sync'd to the video to feel satisfying.
- Some text is shown on screen for too little time to be readable. (the frag message at 1:14, the "grand final" text at 5:21, etc). Yes, some of it was on purpose like the XXX at XXX.
- The Quake audio is mixed in too low for my taste, the hit beeps and other sounds feel like they have no "impact".
In fragmovies with good A/V sync and mixing, the sound combo of the rail/explosion + hit beep + beat feels really satisfying.
- There are frame-rate conversion issues (Example: at 1:44, the video is choppy and you can clearly see that some frames were dropped).
- The 2.35:1 aspect ratio is wasting lots of space on most people's screens.
- Packaging the video in an archive doesn't help with compression and prohibits from reading the file while downloading.
You could just have 2 files, 1 for the video and 1 for an archive that's a download for those interested in the extras (screenshots, readme, demos, configs, etc).
- Posting on ESR before the 60 FPS version is uploaded when it's the one that's the most sought after.

The video was entertaining thanks to the frags but most of the editing made it less enjoyable to watch for me.

EDIT:
Also, to be clear, many of the fine details aren't things I was looking for to bash on the product, it's just things I noticed and thought were worth mentioning.
The aspect ratio, file packing, etc aren't things that made me enjoy the movie less or influenced my rating. I rate based on how much I get entertained only.
Only if some technicality gets in the way of entertainment does it (indirectly) influence the entertainment value (like super clipped audio, blurry video encoding, etc).

wntt:
I apologize if this came off as trying to stir up some shit, it wasn't my intent.
I quite enjoyed moopoint (and saw it several times) and I'm not trying to be mean, this video just didn't really click with me.

About aspect ratio, I have the Acer predator z35 ultra-widescreen and was pleasantly surprised when this frag movie filled my whole screen with its glory =)

Hence the usage of "mostly" instead of "all". I don't dispute the existence of those screens. :-)
I wonder how many games have UI issues with that kind of aspect ratio nowadays. Old games certainly do. What's your experience with this?

Very odd! For instance: Unreal 1 from 1998 runs at 2560x1080 perfectly, aspect is perfect. But some games from even 2016 like Fallout 4 don't even support it... retro games aren't just better games, they're better technology too! haha :)

So what do you rate it? I didnt like it either for some of your reasons.

To me, it's passable (6/10). I rate on entertainment value only. The good frags sustain just enough interest to keep watching in the hope of seeing more of them. The annoying things (primarily the recams showing nothing of interest and the slow-fast effect abuse) aren't enough to make me close the video player.

jup. im with you

Wow, lol....

If this is your 6/10 then most movies must be 2 or 3 for you :(

no video sync to the music for too much stuff and no proper sense of rythm

What?!? This has incredible synchronization with music and frags. I'm pretty sure he captured at a really high fps and used dynamic timescales to sync a lot of stuff.

Regarding aspect and text, that's style. I love it. I can see two seconds of a wntt movie and know it's his. It's unique and tasteful. The same could be said of other great editors ( particularly kos and pez but maybe also entik, ashr, and wussie). Unfortunately not enough people have a unique visual style and so most movies end up looking just like any other.

> I don't really like being overly negative

> - packaging the video in an archive -> I can't even start watching the video while it downloads

...

Ha yep.

The important part of the sentence is, of course, the part you conveniently left out.

And what's wrong about my complaint? Packing a video in an archive is dumb because you won't really compress it further and annoying because of the reason mentioned above.
That's just getting the basics wrong.

And there's no contradiction here. I never said I don't like being too negative, only that I usually don't post negative opinions too often, which you could have understood and verified easily had you not been so intellectually lazy.

I never said I don't like being too negative

o_O, so 'overly' and 'too' are completely different words? if you dont post negative opinions too often what made you post this stuff about unpacking an archive? looks like im not the only one who's lazy

o_O, so 'overly' and 'too' are completely different words?

I'm not going to teach you to read english. The sentence is not ambiguous.

if you dont post negative opinions too often what made you post this stuff about unpacking an archive?

Because it's the first annoyance I experienced and it really was not necessary. I didn't mention it to increase the list of negative points, I mentioned it so it can be handled better next time. What's lazy about mentioning things that can be done better and then explaining why and how?

lazy part is a feeling annoyed to have to unpack a movie

my ''amusement'' caused by a fact that it's probably took less time to unpack it than for you to write about it

;D mate you're funny

There's still no contradiction. It's the second time you're looking for one where there isn't.
a) Being annoyed is not the same as being lazy.
b) If I was too lazy to unpack the video, I would not have done it.
And what annoyed me was not to have to unpack the movie, it was to have to wait for no valid reason. But once again, you would have understood that bit had you actually read properly.

It's very nitpicky and says nothing about the movie itself. It's just pointlessly critical. If you want to be consistent, maybe you should also critique the description of the movie as well? Or the thumbnail?

It's very nitpicky and says nothing about the movie itself.

Correct, and that didn't factor into my rating. It's just a thing that can be done better.

If you want to be consistent, maybe you should also critique the description of the movie as well? Or the thumbnail?

No, the video author isn't the one who posted on ESR and the post is fine. If there was something wrong with either of them, some admin would have fixed the post anyway.
As mind-blowing as it may seem to you, I wasn't trying to find more flaws. It's just something I mentioned in the hope that it's handled better next time.

It doesn't come off that way. A long list of minuses with a couple pluses at the bottom, one of which is kind of under handedly negative.

some really good frags -> there's just enough of them to keep the interest

It's these kinds of reviews that make me smh.

Any bozo with a computer can capture frags, put music to them, loosely sync them, and call it a frag movie (or "collection" (c) zoot). I know because I've made a few. It's not hard and no one is going to win an Oscar or BAFTA for it. We do it because we love quake and like to entertain.

There's lots of quake movies out there that are generic. Lots of the same frags and same type of editing (bland). The only thing that often distinguishes them is the music. But there are the rare editors out there that make movies that are more than the sum of their parts. Wntt does that here. The editing here is as good as the frags. The cuts are sleek and sometimes unexpected. The use of bloom and filters is tasteful and not obnoxious or overdone. And the entire movie exudes a style that no one but wntt has.

The guy knows what he's doing and it's a shame when I see people who can't appreciate it.

We'll just have to agree to disagree.

The biggest problem I have with this is that the video doesn't service the content all too well. The recams don't help the viewer understand or appreciate the frags better. There's recams for frags everyone understands immediately but some with amazing angles don't have any.

For instance, the double double rail frag by flair. How many viewers understood he killed 4 people with 2 consecutive rails on first watch? The small recam at the end can help you understand the second hit was a double rail, but some people may have missed the fact on the first one. The frag message wasn't even changed even though it's a very simple thing to do and it conveys the information effectively.

I don't appreciate the esthetic because, imho, it doesn't show the content in a better light than simply showing everything in first person.

The guy knows what he's doing and it's a shame when I see people who can't appreciate it.

"I appreciate real art and you're too dumb to do so."

You don't have to show frags from every angle. Sometimes the best way to excentuate something is not by beating it over someone's head, Michael Bay style. You can understate things for dramatic effect. I had no problem following the action (the double double or anything else).

Funny, that's exactly how I take your original list of minuses and criticisms. Just good enough that you didn't turn it off. "Passable". Lol. Give me a break.

You don't have to show frags from every angle.

Agreed. Never claimed otherwise either.

Sometimes the best way to excentuate something is not by
beating it over someone's head, Michael Bay style.

Yes, because things can only be subtle or Michael Bay quality. Obviously. Were you going to make Justin Bieber and Call of Duty references next?

Give me a break.

I can accept your opinion but you clearly can't accept that I have another one. This discussion is over and you get your break.

I'm okay with your opinion. Just felt compelled to share my opinion about it. =)

the recams assist in the pace of the video and the other stuff seems to mostly be a stylistic choice

Slick but not pretentious. Straight and to the point. Several subtleties. The selective use of slow mo and third-person didn't relish in the frags but rather smiled at them. The movie really shows how beautiful the game is in the tight mouse movement, sharp weapon switches, patience of players, constant clambering over positions, and especially in the movement of fearzzz.

Not perfect as others point out, but by the end, it reminds me that even though life gets in the way, I'll always manage to squeeze in a duel every few months and remember Quake. Thanks.

Good review. I agree particularly with the argument that it lacks the pretentiousness of many other fragmovies.

didn't watch cause "Download 60fps (coming later)"

you have the patience of a saint, but I totally get it

awesome work man!

Love this after-frag camera flow. 10.

Kinda weak compared to your previus movies

Nice flag defense insaccato ))

ah so THIS is what C N D R meant!

pretty good, i actually prefer sylvia though just for that amazing 'numb' track by clams casino

9

I need to downvote all other movies now, because this one stands out so much :o

brilliant work!
10/10

Oh, first impression was that this movie was well done. Detailed and had some 3rd person scenes. Nicely done and well cut.
Had some players i recognized and nice frags! Yey!

But it did hurt my eyes due the low fps.

Music was beautiful, but it did remove the feeling of a "cool action movie" for me. Totally ok anyways!
Then slow-to-fast-to-slowmotion started to grow. i bared to watch some of it, but one-third of the movie, i closed it.

My eyes hurt to much. Im sorry.

excellent movie, one of the best I've seen in a long time.
fearz movement & aim are out of this world.
also, that rail from evil vs cooller on elder o_0.

wow, 10/10 !!!!

(also posting in future Hall Of Fame thread)

this isnt a fragmovie btw, its a frag-collection (c) zoot


Its a stylish pretty edit with cute hipster music, but theres zero variation, lots of filler frags and no moments standing out.


I dont understand how you guys get hyped over shallow stuff so easily.

yeah fearz such shitnab amirite guise? (c)

Imitating the jokes of your buttbuddy potat and completly missing the point of my post. I didnt expect anything less from you, qwih, good sir. *tips fedora*

Thanks for sharing your valuable insight, Mohammed.

Now that was awkward

what's shallow there? (asking for a friend)

no, srsly. there are some amazing frags, some funny ones and some that are just rare, but not really astonishing. still: shallow? pls explain.

because so many different gametypes are mixed in it, you can never expect the next kind of frag that'll happen and that alone keeps it interesting for me.

btw. this is a frag movie. which is a collection of frags (c) this friend of mine I'm asking for

People are complimenting wntt for his editing, even though he completely sacrficed any potentially interesting montage elements in favour for the synchronization of visuals and music. Thats why I called it shallow. There have been other (successful) attempts where fragmovies created an interesting structure and even small narrative elements. But well, thats what most people always go for, which is style over substance. Guess which one is harder to achieve :)


Anyway, I didnt complain about the quality of the frags, and Im not exactly sure how you were able to misinterpret my comment in the first place.... I just dont get why people are drooling over this so much.

isn't it only natural to assume everyone on esr is shitposting? ;)

thx for the answer. Now I got what you meant.

It is, and to be honest I dont exclude myself from the equotation. All my comments are shitposts in one way or another, its hella addicting.

People are complimenting wntt for his editing, even though he completely sacrficed any potentially interesting montage elements in favour for the synchronization of visuals and music.

wat

I know its a clunky way of phrasing it, but when you finish reading my comment, you should be able to understand (at least roughly) what I'm trying to say

Can you give an example of narrative elements or "interesting structure" in a frag video?

By interesting structure, are you talking about something like Momento or Run Lola Run?

Sure, I'll post a more careful recap of some fragmovies later/tomorow.

And @ your second question: 6/10, almost believed you are serious, especially when taking your flag into account. Anyway, please listen to my irrelevant opinion: both movies are made to impress 12yo's, and even then they suck.

What does my flag have to do with anything?

You mentioned "interesting structures". Trying to understand what you mean. But now I can see you're talking out of your ass.

Sorry, still don't get it. Could you please explain what "potentially interesting montage elements" are, and why/how he "completely sacrificed" all of them?

hey!Can you post movie cfg link for download?Cfg looks cool!!!

the cfg is pretty default by itself. postworks make it look like it looks

for me looked kinda special xD

very good Music and config

9.99/10

- it's 30 fps.

+ 9000 because wntt so

9009.99/10

By the way how on earth are the slowmo scenes so smooth? Whenever I try to use these timescales the player movement is invariably affected by the godawful model lurching/jerking, no exceptions.

Taking into account that's the movie is 30fps, it's smooth af, especially once downloaded and not off youtube. Looking forward to the 60fps version, will be even smoother!

I think its recorded with an extremly high framerate 240, 300 maybe even higher. so you have more options in your editing software.

hey, it's cl_aviFrameRate 200, flycams are recorded at .1 timescale in addition

Ash jumped on rehe's head bueheheh nice fragmovie.

Nononno, it's called a "frag-collection" from now!

That's the frag movie ESR has been waiting for. Perfect execution.

Are the upward vertical angles and the movie title connected?

by dragons he probably meant excellent award

or powerful opponents in the sky

Insaccato in the movie = 10/10

wntt you're amazing, thank you once again :)

I remember a while ago you were unsure if you were going to continue doing all this. Please, please do <3

that shit just went on my favorites list. awesome!!

60 fps download added

Weird that it's also exactly 2GB, I guess it was the target for the render but image quality should suffer a bit.

60 fps version uploaded to youtube :



(link : https://youtu.be/3aEesOoe3Gw)

9/10. Didn't even like the music but it wasn't irritating or OTT.

+1, i've got the same vote

That was mesmerizing.

Quite a nice movie edited with high skills

Ed: Mirrored at http://arrrgh.fr/videos/?file=/chasing-dragons60.mp4

the music choice is pretty unique, great impression overall